| Bill (Crossfile) | Bill Title & Upcoming Hearings | Sponsor | Status | Position / Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HB 29 (SB 917) | Electronic Payment Transactions - Interchange Fees - Calculation and Use of Data | T. Morgan | In the House - Hearing 1/21 at 1:00 p.m. (1/8) | House Bill 29, also known as the "Electronic Payment Transactions - Interchange Fees - Calculation and Use of Data":
Purpose: The bill aims to regulate the calculation and use of interchange fees in electronic payment transactions, ensuring that taxes and gratuities are excluded from the amount on which these fees are charged. Key Changes: Requires entities processing electronic payment transactions to exclude the amount of tax and gratuity from the interchange fee calculation. Mandates credit and debit card issuers to credit merchants with the amount of interchange fees charged on the tax and gratuity portion of transactions, provided the merchant submits the necessary documentation. Prohibits the use of electronic payment transaction data for purposes other than facilitating the transaction, preventing fraud, supporting loyalty programs, tailoring products and services, or as required by law. Establishes civil penalties for non-compliance with the provisions of the bill. Regulations: The bill outlines the responsibilities of issuers, payment card networks, acquirer banks, and processors in implementing these changes, including the exclusion of tax and gratuity amounts from interchange fee calculations and the crediting of merchants. | |
| HB 64 | Theft of Mail and Packages and Victim Notification | Conaway | In the House - Hearing 1/21 at 1:00 p.m. (1/10) | House Bill 64, also known as the "Theft of Mail and Packages and Victim Notification Act":
Purpose: The bill aims to prohibit the theft of mail or packages and ensure that victims are notified about court proceedings related to such thefts. Key Changes: Prohibits knowingly or willfully obtaining or exerting control over mail or packages delivered to another person with the intent to deprive the owner. Classifies the theft of mail or packages as a felony, with a penalty of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years. Requires prosecuting attorneys to notify victims or their representatives about court proceedings, the right to submit a victim impact statement, and any post-trial court proceedings, appeals, or sentence reviews related to the case. | |
| HB 107 (SB 49) | Consumer Protection - Automatic Renewals | Pruski | Approved by the Governor - Chapter 205 (4/22) | House Bill 107, also known as the "Consumer Protection - Automatic Renewals":
Purpose: The bill aims to regulate automatic renewal offers to consumers, ensuring transparency and ease of cancellation. Key Changes: Requires clear and conspicuous presentation of the terms of the automatic renewal offer before the subscription or purchasing agreement is fulfilled. Mandates that consumers be provided with an easily accessible disclosure of the methods to cancel the automatic renewal. Prohibits automatic charging of a consumer's credit card without clear and conspicuous notice. Establishes that compliance with certain state or federal regulations is considered compliance with this Act. Classifies violations of this Act as unfair, abusive, or deceptive trade practices. | |
| HB 179 (SB 11) | Organized Retail Theft Act of 2025 | Toles | Approved by the Governor - Chapter 192 (4/22) | House Bill 179, also known as the "Organized Retail Theft Act of 2025":
Purpose: The bill aims to address organized retail theft by providing legal provisions for the prosecution of multiple thefts committed by the same person in multiple counties under one scheme or continuing course of conduct. Key Changes: Allows multiple thefts committed by the same person in multiple counties under one scheme to be joined and prosecuted in any county where one of the thefts occurred. Defines "organized retail theft" as the commission of a series of thefts of retail merchandise from one or more retail merchants over a 90-day period with the intent to permanently deprive the merchant of the merchandise, return the merchandise for monetary gain, or resell, trade, or barter the merchandise for monetary gain. Establishes penalties for organized retail theft based on the aggregate value of the stolen property, with varying degrees of imprisonment and fines. Requires courts to make a finding of fact as to whether a crime is organized retail theft for reporting purposes | |
| HB 194 | Consumer Protection - Retail Sales - Payment or Reimbursement of Shipping Costs | Conaway | In the Senate - Hearing 3/19 at 1:00 p.m. (3/13) | House Bill 194, "Consumer Protection - Retail Sales - Reimbursement of Shipping Costs":
Purpose: The bill aims to ensure that consumers are reimbursed for shipping costs when they receive incorrect items from merchants. Key Changes: Requires merchants to refund the full amount of shipping costs incurred by consumers to return incorrect items within 30 days of receiving a refund request. Defines "consumer" as the purchaser of consumer goods, services, or credit, excluding resale purposes. Defines "merchant" and "retail sale" for the purposes of the bill. Classifies violations of this requirement as unfair, abusive, or deceptive trade practices subject to enforcement and penalties under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act. Effective Date: The Act shall take effect on October 1, 2025 | |
| HB 208 | Consumer Protection - False Advertising - Digital Goods | Pruski | Approved by the Governor - Chapter 206 (4/22) | House Bill 208, Consumer Protection - False Advertising - Digital Goods
Purpose: The bill aims to prohibit false advertising related to digital goods and ensure that consumers are fully informed about the nature of their purchases. Key Changes: Prohibits advertising or offering for sale a digital good using terminology that implies unrestricted ownership unless certain acknowledgments are received from the purchaser and clear statements are provided by the seller. Requires sellers to receive an affirmative acknowledgment from the purchaser that they are receiving a license to access a digital good, along with a complete list of restrictions and conditions of the license. Mandates that sellers provide a clear and conspicuous statement that the purchaser is buying a license for the digital good and includes a digital method to access the license details, terms, and conditions. | |
| HB 224 | Commercial Law - False Advertising - Penalties | Conaway | In the House - Hearing 1/21 at 1:00 p.m. (1/8) | House Bill 224, "Commercial Law - False Advertising - Penalties":
Purpose: The bill aims to increase the maximum penalty for violating the prohibition against false advertising. Key Changes: Increases the maximum penalty for false advertising from $500 to $1,000 for each violation. Allows the Attorney General to recover the penalty for the State in a civil action. Effective Date: The Act shall take effect on October 1, 2025 | |
| HB 546 (SB 605) | Digital Advertising Gross Revenues Tax - Assessments - Appeals and Corrections | Feldmark | Approved by the Governor - Chapter 677 (5/20) | House Bill 546, titled "Digital Advertising Gross Revenues Tax - Assessments - Appeals and Corrections," proposes changes to the regulation of digital advertising gross revenues tax in Maryland. Key provisions include:
- Establishing an appeal process for persons subject to the digital advertising gross revenues tax who receive a notice of assessment from the Comptroller. The act is set to take effect on January 1, 2026. | |
| HB 805 (SB 410) | Criminal Law - Mail and Package Theft | Solomon | In the House - Hearing 2/18 at 11:00 a.m. (2/17) | House Bill 805, titled "Cannabis - Licensee Locations - Restrictions," proposes changes to the regulations for licensed cannabis dispensaries in Maryland. Key provisions include:
- Altering the distance restrictions from 2,000 feet to one-half mile applicable to a licensed cannabis dispensary. The act was approved by the Governor on April 25, 2024. | |
| HB 1089 (SB 904) | Data Brokers - Registry and Gross Income Tax (Building Information Guardrails Data Act of 2025) | Solomon | In the House - Hearing 2/25 at 1:00 p.m. (Economic Matters) (2/6) | Purpose:
Key Provisions:
Reporting and Compliance:
Effective Dates:
| |
| HB 1365 | Commercial Law - Online Data Privacy - Limits on Data Collection | Harrison | In the House - Hearing 3/04 at 1:00 p.m. (2/7) | Purpose:
To amend the requirements for controllers regarding the collection and processing of personal data in Maryland.
Key Provisions:
Limitation on Data Collection:
Controllers must limit the collection of personal data to what is adequate, relevant, and reasonably necessary for the disclosed purposes.
Removes the requirement that data collection must be proportionate to providing or maintaining a specific product or service requested by the consumer.
Data Security Practices:
Controllers must establish, implement, and maintain reasonable administrative, technical, and physical data security practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and accessibility of personal data.
Consumer Consent Revocation:
Controllers must provide an effective mechanism for consumers to revoke their consent, which is at least as easy as the mechanism by which consent was provided.
Effective Date:
October 1, 2025. | |
| SB 11 (HB 179) | Organized Retail Theft Act of 2025 | Watson | Approved by the Governor - Chapter 191 (4/22) | Senate Bill 11, "Organized Retail Theft Act of 2025":
Purpose: The bill aims to address organized retail theft by providing legal provisions for the prosecution of multiple thefts committed by the same person in multiple counties under one scheme or continuing course of conduct.
Establishes penalties for organized retail theft based on the aggregate value of the stolen property, with varying degrees of imprisonment and fines. Requires courts to make a finding of fact as to whether a crime is organized retail theft for reporting purposes. | |
| SB 49 (HB 107) | Consumer Protection - Automatic Renewals | Gile | Approved by the Governor - Chapter 204 (4/22) | Senate Bill 49, also known as the "Consumer Protection - Automatic Renewals":
Purpose: The bill aims to regulate automatic renewal offers to consumers, ensuring transparency and ease of cancellation. Key Changes: Requires clear and conspicuous presentation of the terms of the automatic renewal offer before the subscription or purchasing agreement is fulfilled. Mandates that consumers be provided with an easily accessible disclosure of the methods to cancel the automatic renewal. Prohibits automatic charging of a consumer's credit card without clear and conspicuous notice. Establishes that compliance with certain state or federal regulations is considered compliance with this Act. Classifies violations of this Act as unfair, abusive, or deceptive trade practices. | |
| SB 410 (HB 805) | Criminal Law - Mail and Package Theft | Waldstreicher | In the Senate - Hearing 2/05 at 2:00 p.m. (1/24) | Senate Bill 410, titled "Criminal Law - Mail and Package Theft," proposes changes to the regulation of mail and package theft in Maryland. Key provisions include:
- Prohibiting a person from knowingly and intentionally opening mail addressed to another without permission of the person or an authorized designee. The act is set to take effect on October 1, 2025. | |
| SB 605 (HB 546) | Digital Advertising Gross Revenues Tax - Assessments - Appeals and Corrections | Zucker | Approved by the Governor - Chapter 678 (5/20) | Senate Bill 605, titled "Election Law - Automatic Voter Registration - Alterations," proposes changes to the automatic voter registration process in Maryland. Key provisions include:
- Establishing new procedures for automatic voter registration at the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) and the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange (MHBE). The act is set to take effect on January 1, 2025. | |
| SB 904 (HB 1089) | Data Brokers - Registry and Gross Income Tax (Building Information Guardrails Data Act of 2025) | Hester | In the Senate - Hearing 3/05 at 1:00 p.m. (Budget and Taxation) (2/5) | see crossfile | |
| SB 917 (HB 29) | Electronic Payment Transactions - Interchange Fees - Calculation and Use of Data | Kramer | In the Senate - Withdrawn by Sponsor (3/10) | see crossfile | |
| SB 936 | Consumer Protection - High-Risk Artificial Intelligence - Developer and Deployer Requirements | Hester | In the Senate - Hearing 2/27 at 1:00 p.m. (2/6) | Senate Bill 936 titled the "High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer Act." The bill establishes requirements for developers and deployers of high-risk artificial intelligence (AI) systems to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination. Key provisions include:
Developer Responsibilities:
Developers must use reasonable care to protect consumers from known and foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination.
Before providing a high-risk AI system to a deployer or another developer, developers are required to disclose specific information to the deployer or developer.
Developers must make certain documentation and information available to facilitate an impact assessment.
Deployer Responsibilities:
Deployers are required to design, implement, and maintain a risk management policy and program for the high-risk AI systems they use.
Deployers must complete an impact assessment of their high-risk AI systems.
Deployers are obligated to provide consumers with information regarding the deployment of and decisions made by high-risk AI systems.
Deployers must offer consumers an opportunity to correct certain information and appeal consequential decisions.
Enforcement and Legal Recourse:
The Attorney General is authorized to enforce the provisions of this Act.
Consumers have the right to bring a civil action against a deployer under specified circumstances. |